Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Caving in on the Clarks Desert Boot need fit advice

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)


    Okay,


    I'm just about to cave in and buy me a pair of desert boots from shoebuy.com. I think they have the best deal for members. 5 dollars off standard discount and 10% off for members this month I believe.


    How do these fit? I'm reading that they run a little on the large side so I should get a half size smaller.


    What my main concern is how do they fit with pants. My pants are generally slim fit and I'm wondering what kind of leg opening these boots are going to have to need without it looking like I'm tucking my pants into my boots.


    Also I'm thinking about going with the Oakwood Suede or the standard Beeswax Leather. I want to know how the Oakwood Suede hold up to a little wet weather and some snow.


    Thanks in advance.


  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)


    I own the beeswax version of the clarks desert boots, they are awesome. I did size down half size, and they do stretch a little bit over time. As far as pants, I have not had an issue with any pants not being able to fit with them properly.


    Now I own three pairs of clarks desert boots, 2 suede (grey & black), and then the beeswax version. I wear the beeswax the most out of any and find them the most versatile for casual wear. I cannot attest to how they would hold up in the wet or snow due to the fact that I do not wear them in wet conditions. I have other boots I wear for rain conditions ( no snow where I reside in sunny cali-for-ni-a !


  3. #3
    Super Moderator LesserBlackDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    5,513
    Mentioned
    427 Post(s)
    Quoted
    2074 Post(s)


    My personal preference between the suede and leather would be the leather. You can easily clean, condition, and waterproof leather shoes. There are suede waterproofers available, but they don't work as well and can ruin the look of the suede by flattening the nap. I think leather is a little more versatile, both in looks and function, and will last longer over time than suede.

    Ben

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)


    Thanks guys for your input.


    @BenR Did you have to size down as well?


  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)


    I got the bushacre style in brown suede at Marshalls for $60. My normal size is 11 1/2 wide but I sized down to 11 and they fit pretty well, though I did get a nasty blister on the back of one ankle the first time I did a lot of walking in them. I think I didn't have it laced quite tight enough and so my foot was able to move around too much. They are also a bit tight at the widest part of my foot.


    Definitely far from the most comfortable shoes around, but they are nice for what they are. No problems with straight leg jeans.


  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)


    I went down a half size as well, worked great. I'd go with the beeswax leather, and you probably won't want to wear them in snow/wet anyway, the crepe sole is slippery, but the leather should do better than the suede should that problem arise


  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)


    @Sat I'm looking at the bushacres and I can't find a difference between those and the regular desert boots. Except that they're cheaper and apparently everyone says they're more comfortable.


    Now this has become an entirely new dilemma for me. I think I need to go around and shop for some.


    But yeah I know to size down now.


  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)


    Vinny, I think the main difference with the Bushacre is the sole is rubber instead of crepe. Should last longer at the expense maybe of being less soft...I don't have anything else to compare them to though myself.


    I think the stitching and eyelets may be less contrasty on the bushacres also, at least mine seem that way. I like it.


  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)


    Oh BTW check this where someone posted pics for comparison:

    http://www.styleforum.net/t/27461/cl...boots/5600_100


  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)


    "Definitely far from the most comfortable shoes around, but they are nice for what they are. No problems with straight leg jeans."


    I got gray bushacres about during the summer, and I have to say that they are almost the most comfortable shoe I have ever put on. I suppose it depends on whose foot it is.


    OP: I wear 9s, 9.5s, or 10's depending on the brand, and the 9s fit me great in bushacres, which I assume fit the same as the regular desert boots. Sizing down 1/2 should work.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •