Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Single Monk vs Single Monk styles

  1. #11
    Varsity Member armedferret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Sometimes TX, Sometimes MD
    Posts
    1,245
    Mentioned
    69 Post(s)
    Quoted
    399 Post(s)
    Warwick love....




    ETA: Pants actually sit just a tad lower; I leaned over to get the angle right on the photo so they rode up just a tad.
    Last edited by armedferret; March 9th, 2017 at 08:48 AM.

  2. #12
    Varsity Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    674
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Quoted
    197 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Token View Post
    Because I feel it's weird to want to wear a monkstrap but not want to show arguably the defining feature of a monkstrap (the buckle). It's like wanting a pair of button boots but then hiding all the buttons... why not just get a standard pair of boots then? Not sure your point about ostentatiousness is relevant: a single monk whether it has a visible buckle or not is still more reserved than a double monk. Just because I want the buckle to be visible doesn't mean I should skip the Warwick in favor of the Mora. If I'm wearing a monkstrap then I'm making a conscious decision to be more ostentatious vs. wearing a captoe, if the buckle + strap aren't even visible then I'd rather just wear wholecuts.
    First, I think that unless you wear your trousers with an unstylishly full break, the full shoe would at some point show, whether while walking or sitting down.

    Next, I don't think it's weird to have a style feature that is somewhat hidden. In fact, I think button boots are kind of cool, but I also think they are very dandy. I would enjoy wearing them, but having the buttons go largely unnoticed. I also wear colorful socks even when I'm wearing boots, and no one would see them unless I'm sitting down cross-legged by chance.

  3. #13
    Varsity Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,059
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Quoted
    452 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Token View Post
    Because I feel it's weird to want to wear a monkstrap but not want to show arguably the defining feature of a monkstrap (the buckle). It's like wanting a pair of button boots but then hiding all the buttons...
    I'm not saying you should hide the buckle. I'm saying that the idea that you should wear no-break pants specifically to show the buckle all the time is a bit much. It's a bit like saying if you wear those button boots, you need to wear ankle swingers to ensure no one can possibly miss them. It's lacking any subtlety and seems try-hard to me. Also, as Spex pointed out, unless you're wearing pants with a really heavy break, your buckles are going to show anyway.

    Quote Originally Posted by Domino View Post
    Maybe it's just me, but I actually like the cutaway single monk for that same reason. I think of any monk strap as a bit more flashy and fancy, and the cutaway version as the flashiest and fanciest of the options.
    I don't think it's fancier or flashier. I think it's sleeker. The buckle and strap across the Warwick is chunky and I find it unattractive, especially sitting on top of a shoe that's otherwise so subdued and minimal. I don't think it's an ugly style, but I'm not a big fan.
    Last edited by dpark; March 9th, 2017 at 12:16 PM.

  4. #14
    Varsity Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    898
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Quoted
    354 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dpark View Post
    I'm not saying you should hide the buckle. I'm saying that the idea that you should wear no-break pants specifically to show the buckle all the time is a bit much. It's a bit like saying if you wear those button boots, you need to wear ankle swingers to ensure no one can possibly miss them. It's lacking any subtlety and seems try-hard to me. Also, as Spex pointed out, unless you're wearing pants with a really heavy break, your buckles are going to show anyway.



    I don't think it's fancier or flashier. I think it's sleeker. The buckle and strap across the Warwick is chunky and I find it unattractive, especially sitting on top of a shoe that's otherwise so subdued and minimal. I don't think it's an ugly style, but I'm not a big fan.
    I think you're taking extremes here. How does me saying that I like a visible monkstrap buckle (when 90%+ of monkstraps have visible buckles across the vamp) translate to me advocating for wearing ankle swingers so that every single button on my button boots is visible? Anyone who owns a pair of non-cutaway monkstraps and enjoys wearing them is either consciously or subconsciously making a decision to show off the buckle. Buckles aren't any faster to fasten than tying laces and there's less granularity to how secure of a fit you can get due to there only being 3-4 holes, so for me buckles are primarily an aesthetic feature rather than a practical one.

    I don't own a pair of cutaway monks, and I've never seen a pair in person, so I have no idea how they interact with trousers and how the aesthetic of the shoe changes depending on whether you can see the buckle or not, however if you gave me a pair of EG Audley but with the buckle and strap removed it would look like an unbalanced wholecut variation to me and I would not wear it. I'm sure that Spex is right and that the buckle would be visible whenever you sit, and who knows if I ever get a pair of cutaway monks I might think they look fantastic. None of that changes the fact that currently all of my monkstraps have a constantly visible buckle and I quite enjoy that. If I'm in a setting where buckles are too ostentatious then I simply wear a more formal shoe rather than a more formal monkstrap.

    I'm not really sure what you're looking to get out of this discussion. OP asked for people's opinions and I gave mine. If you're bored and just wanted to tell me that my taste lacks subtlety and I'm a try-hard with my visible monkstrap buckles then I hope you were entertained.

  5. #15
    Varsity Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,059
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Quoted
    452 Post(s)
    I kind of think you're being a little oversensitive here. You made a statement about needing no-break pants that I found weird and I said so. That's pretty much the whole story.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •