Originally posted by LesserBlackDog
View Post
I would have preferred an adaptation of The Hobbit that directed it towards the tones and adult nature that much of the dialogue and action contained in The Lord of the Rings instead of a film with far younger values coming when fans of the Tolkien film universe are now 10 years older. It also was very obvious to me that the film relied on more CGI than ever, and went for more colorful stylization than I could welcome into a land I've already pictured and been shown. While there was certainly a lot of shooting in New Zealand, it appeared to be far more altered footage and lighting than the previous trilogy and far less interested in familiar light and physics that we were comfortable with in the original films as we saw what was far more plausible and dramatically compelling play out.
I had a good time, but this film was no legendary film act of a trilogy, which is something many would agree can be said for all three of the original trilogy entries.
Comment